Comparison
Gamma vs Pitch
Gamma and Pitch are both presentation tools, but they're built around different jobs. Gamma is AI-native, describe a topic and get a deck. Pitch is collaboration-native, a shared workspace where teams build and track decks together.
Quick answer
Updated July 3, 2026
Choose Gamma if you're one person who wants AI to turn a prompt into a polished deck quickly and edit it by chatting. Choose Pitch if your team co-edits decks together and relies on tracked links, viewer analytics and sales rooms. If you'd rather describe your idea and get a finished, from-scratch document, decks, CVs, reports and spreadsheets in one tool, Slaide is a third option worth a look.
If you're one person who wants a finished deck quickly, that's Gamma's home turf. If you're a team that co-edits and sends decks to clients, that's where Pitch was designed to live.
At a glance
| Gamma | Pitch | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Quickly spinning up a good-looking deck or a simple web page from a prompt. | Sales and marketing teams that collaborate on decks and care about engagement analytics. |
| Free plan | Free, one-time AI credits, watermark | Free, up to 5 members, Pitch branding |
| Pricing | Free plan with a one-time pool of AI credits and a “Made with Gamma” watermark on exports. Paid plans start at roughly $10/month (Plus), with Pro around $18/month. | Free for up to 5 members (100 one-time AI credits, Pitch branding on exports). Plus is $10/month, Team $15/seat/month and Business $20/seat/month, all billed annually. |
| What it makes | Primarily presentations; also documents, websites and social posts. | Classic slide decks (sales and pitch presentations) plus shareable deal rooms. |
| Uses your files | Imports PPTX, DOCX, PDF, Google Slides/Docs, Notion and URLs (mostly the text, styling is reapplied). | File import is practically PPTX-only; exports to PDF (all plans) and PowerPoint (Plus and up). |
Strengths and limitations
Gamma
Strengths
- Very fast at turning a prompt or pasted text into a designed deck
- Three output types from one tool, slides, documents and websites
- Conversational “agent” editing to restyle and adjust
- Polished default themes and a responsive, web-native format
Limitations
- PowerPoint export is lossy, slides can come out as images with text you can no longer edit
- Free credits are a one-time pool, not a monthly refresh, and exports keep a watermark
- Cloud-only, no offline or desktop mode
- A recognisable “house style”, with limited fine-grained layout control
Pitch
Strengths
- Real-time team collaboration, several people editing one deck at once
- Strong analytics: tracked links, engagement data and client-facing “Pitch Rooms”
- Custom fonts, brand library and high visual polish
- CRM integration (HubSpot) for sales workflows
Limitations
- AI features arrived late and are still maturing versus AI-native tools
- AI credits are capped (just 100 one-time on Free)
- Import is essentially PPTX-only, other tools must export first
- Heavily oriented around sales and deal workflows
Which should you choose?
Gamma's strength is speed from a prompt. Its conversational editing and polished themes get you to a presentable deck fast, and it can also produce documents and simple web pages. The trade-offs: free AI credits are a one-time pool, free exports carry a watermark, and PowerPoint export is lossy.
Pitch's strength is the team. Real-time co-editing, shared brand and font libraries, tracked links, viewer analytics and 'Pitch Rooms' are genuinely useful for sales and marketing, and the free plan supports up to five members. Its weaknesses are the mirror image of Gamma's: AI arrived later and is still maturing, AI credits are capped, and import is essentially PowerPoint-only.
Choose Gamma if
you want AI to turn a prompt into a polished deck quickly and edit it by chatting.
Choose Pitch if
your team co-edits decks together and you rely on tracked links, analytics and sales rooms.
A third option
Worth a look: Slaide
Gamma decks look like Gamma decks. Pitch decks look like Pitch decks. Yours should look like yours. Both tools are built around presentations with a recognisable template style. Slaide has no templates: describe what you need and the document is designed from scratch for that specific request. Most AI tools hand you a draft. Slaide hands you a finished document. The tool that made your pitch deck is the same one that makes your CV, your board report, your one-pager. The document range goes beyond decks: board reports, consulting deliverables, CVs, one-pagers, research papers, live spreadsheets.
Slaide is free to start with no credit card, Pro is €18/month with no watermark, and optional pay-as-you-go covers usage beyond your balance. Because Slaide is built for one person creating fast, it is not a replacement for Pitch's real-time co-editing and deal rooms; if those are central to your workflow, Pitch is the right tool for that part.
FAQ
Which has better AI, Gamma or Pitch?
Gamma. It's AI-native, so prompt-to-deck and conversational editing are core. Pitch added generative AI later and it's still maturing, with capped AI credits, its strength is collaboration, not AI.
Does Pitch have a free plan?
Yes. Pitch is free for up to five members, with a 100-credit one-time AI pool and Pitch branding on exports. Gamma also has a free plan, with one-time AI credits and a 'Made with Gamma' watermark on free exports.
Is there an alternative to both?
Slaide has no templates, every document is designed from scratch for your specific request. Unlike Gamma (theme-based) and Pitch (template libraries), Slaide's output doesn't carry a tool's visual fingerprint. Covers pitch decks, board reports, CVs, one-pagers and live spreadsheets. Free to start, no card, Pro €18/month. Built for solo creation, not real-time team co-editing.
One workspace for all of it
Gamma and Pitch are both presentation tools. Slaide also makes reports, CVs and spreadsheets from the same materials, free to start, no credit card.
Start free